Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
The court held that Rule 86A empowers the Commissioner or authorized officer to restrict debit of fraudulently availed or ineligible Input Tax Credit (ITC) from the electronic credit ledger for discharge of liabilities or refund claims, subject to recording reasons in writing. Sub-rule (3) mandates that such restriction shall cease after one year from imposition. As the restriction was imposed on 23rd November 2022 and one year lapsed around 23rd November 2023, the restriction has ceased by operation of law. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
The court held that Rule 86A empowers the Commissioner or authorized officer to restrict debit of fraudulently availed or ineligible Input Tax Credit (ITC) from the electronic credit ledger for discharge of liabilities or refund claims, subject to recording reasons in writing. Sub-rule (3) mandates that such restriction shall cease after one year from imposition. As the restriction was imposed on 23rd November 2022 and one year lapsed around 23rd November 2023, the restriction has ceased by operation of law. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.