Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
Non-compete fees paid by assessee were held to be revenue expenditure, deductible u/s 28(va) of Income Tax Act. Relying on Gujarat High Court's decision in Smartchem Technologies Limited, ITAT ruled that expenditure related to profit-earning apparatus is revenue in nature. Disallowance of non-compete fees by lower authorities was unjustified. Assessee's appeal was allowed.
Non-compete fees paid by assessee were held to be revenue expenditure, deductible u/s 28(va) of Income Tax Act. Relying on Gujarat High Court's decision in Smartchem Technologies Limited, ITAT ruled that expenditure related to profit-earning apparatus is revenue in nature. Disallowance of non-compete fees by lower authorities was unjustified. Assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.