Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
Violation of principles of natural justice - denial of cross-examination - revocation of customs broker license, forfeiture of security deposit, and penalty imposed by adjudicating authority - investigation revealed undervaluation, misdeclaration, undeclared/concealed goods, and prohibited nature of goods - importer alleged to be a dummy firm - appellant customs broker denied opportunity to cross-examine persons whose statements were relied upon by department - inquiry officer delayed issuance of report beyond prescribed period - right of cross-examination recognized under CBLR Regulations - exceptional circumstances required for denial of cross-examination - appellant questioned integrity of statements recorded u/s 108 - no attempt made to secure presence of witnesses for cross-examination - provisions of Regulation 17(4) disregarded - serious prejudice caused to appellant - impugned order set aside, appeal allowed.
Violation of principles of natural justice - denial of cross-examination - revocation of customs broker license, forfeiture of security deposit, and penalty imposed by adjudicating authority - investigation revealed undervaluation, misdeclaration, undeclared/concealed goods, and prohibited nature of goods - importer alleged to be a dummy firm - appellant customs broker denied opportunity to cross-examine persons whose statements were relied upon by department - inquiry officer delayed issuance of report beyond prescribed period - right of cross-examination recognized under CBLR Regulations - exceptional circumstances required for denial of cross-examination - appellant questioned integrity of statements recorded u/s 108 - no attempt made to secure presence of witnesses for cross-examination - provisions of Regulation 17(4) disregarded - serious prejudice caused to appellant - impugned order set aside, appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
