Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out...
Agency in CNG distribution makes outlet operators commission agents, rendering taxable Business Auxiliary Service rather than purchasing goods for res...
Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Appellate Authority affirmed impugned order without evidence...
Appellate authority's inconsistent approach in accepting/rejecting contentions sans evidence rejected. Order quashed, remanded for judicial consideration.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Appellate Authority affirmed impugned order without evidence regarding petitioner's intention to evade tax. Inconsistent approach rejecting petitioner's contention for lack of evidence while accepting department's contention despite absence of evidence. Appellate Authority must act judicially, adopting same approach towards assessee and department. Order quashed, petition allowed by way of remand.
Appellate Authority affirmed impugned order without evidence regarding petitioner's intention to evade tax. Inconsistent approach rejecting petitioner's contention for lack of evidence while accepting department's contention despite absence of evidence. Appellate Authority must act judicially, adopting same approach towards assessee and department. Order quashed, petition allowed by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.