Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Appellate Authority affirmed impugned order without evidence...
Appellate authority's inconsistent approach in accepting/rejecting contentions sans evidence rejected. Order quashed, remanded for judicial consideration.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Appellate Authority affirmed impugned order without evidence regarding petitioner's intention to evade tax. Inconsistent approach rejecting petitioner's contention for lack of evidence while accepting department's contention despite absence of evidence. Appellate Authority must act judicially, adopting same approach towards assessee and department. Order quashed, petition allowed by way of remand.
Appellate Authority affirmed impugned order without evidence regarding petitioner's intention to evade tax. Inconsistent approach rejecting petitioner's contention for lack of evidence while accepting department's contention despite absence of evidence. Appellate Authority must act judicially, adopting same approach towards assessee and department. Order quashed, petition allowed by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.