Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Expenditure incurred by subsidiary company for overseeing and executing contracts entered by parent company cannot be considered as business loss of subsidiary. Subsidiary did not undertake its own business and expenses were not occasioned in process or for its business. Expenditure must be connected with or related to business carried on by assessee and profits and gains therein to allow loss. Holding and subsidiary are separate entities, expenditure pertaining to one cannot be claimed by other. For deduction u/s 37, prerequisites are expenditure incurred in respect of business carried on by assessee and spent wholly and exclusively for its own business. Expenditure incurred by subsidiary not in ordinary course of its business cannot be allowed as deduction.
Expenditure incurred by subsidiary company for overseeing and executing contracts entered by parent company cannot be considered as business loss of subsidiary. Subsidiary did not undertake its own business and expenses were not occasioned in process or for its business. Expenditure must be connected with or related to business carried on by assessee and profits and gains therein to allow loss. Holding and subsidiary are separate entities, expenditure pertaining to one cannot be claimed by other. For deduction u/s 37, prerequisites are expenditure incurred in respect of business carried on by assessee and spent wholly and exclusively for its own business. Expenditure incurred by subsidiary not in ordinary course of its business cannot be allowed as deduction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.