Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The Appellate Tribunal held that the Financial Creditor is permitted to amend the date of default pleaded in the rejoinder affidavit, as the date of default is relevant for computing the limitation period for filing an application u/s 95. It is well-settled that a Financial Creditor can supplement the application by filing additional documents. In this case, the issue of invoking the Personal Guarantor's guarantee was specifically raised. The Adjudicating Authority granted time to the Personal Guarantor to file a reply opposing the new date of default inserted by the Petitioner. The Personal Guarantor has ample opportunity to satisfy the court that the amended date is not the correct date and raise contentions regarding limitation. Parties are entitled to bring additional materials on record, which can be accepted by the Adjudicating Authority. The rights of the Personal Guarantor are fully protected, and there are no grounds to entertain the appeal, which is dismissed.
The Appellate Tribunal held that the Financial Creditor is permitted to amend the date of default pleaded in the rejoinder affidavit, as the date of default is relevant for computing the limitation period for filing an application u/s 95. It is well-settled that a Financial Creditor can supplement the application by filing additional documents. In this case, the issue of invoking the Personal Guarantor's guarantee was specifically raised. The Adjudicating Authority granted time to the Personal Guarantor to file a reply opposing the new date of default inserted by the Petitioner. The Personal Guarantor has ample opportunity to satisfy the court that the amended date is not the correct date and raise contentions regarding limitation. Parties are entitled to bring additional materials on record, which can be accepted by the Adjudicating Authority. The rights of the Personal Guarantor are fully protected, and there are no grounds to entertain the appeal, which is dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
