Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Demand regarding disparity between e-way bills and GSTR 3B returns for 2018-19 to 2020-21 assessment periods. Petitioner stated disparity due to non-taxable supplies in e-way bills portal. Supporting documents not annexed to reply. Respondent did not refer to ITC-04 returns. Petitioner could have provided comprehensive explanation. Order set aside on condition of remitting Rs. 3,50,00,000/- towards disputed tax demand within six weeks and permitted to submit reply with relevant documents. Petition disposed of.
Demand regarding disparity between e-way bills and GSTR 3B returns for 2018-19 to 2020-21 assessment periods. Petitioner stated disparity due to non-taxable supplies in e-way bills portal. Supporting documents not annexed to reply. Respondent did not refer to ITC-04 returns. Petitioner could have provided comprehensive explanation. Order set aside on condition of remitting Rs. 3,50,00,000/- towards disputed tax demand within six weeks and permitted to submit reply with relevant documents. Petition disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
