Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Demand regarding disparity between e-way bills and GSTR 3B returns for 2018-19 to 2020-21 assessment periods. Petitioner stated disparity due to non-taxable supplies in e-way bills portal. Supporting documents not annexed to reply. Respondent did not refer to ITC-04 returns. Petitioner could have provided comprehensive explanation. Order set aside on condition of remitting Rs. 3,50,00,000/- towards disputed tax demand within six weeks and permitted to submit reply with relevant documents. Petition disposed of.
Demand regarding disparity between e-way bills and GSTR 3B returns for 2018-19 to 2020-21 assessment periods. Petitioner stated disparity due to non-taxable supplies in e-way bills portal. Supporting documents not annexed to reply. Respondent did not refer to ITC-04 returns. Petitioner could have provided comprehensive explanation. Order set aside on condition of remitting Rs. 3,50,00,000/- towards disputed tax demand within six weeks and permitted to submit reply with relevant documents. Petition disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.