Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Demand regarding disparity between e-way bills and GSTR 3B returns for 2018-19 to 2020-21 assessment periods. Petitioner stated disparity due to non-taxable supplies in e-way bills portal. Supporting documents not annexed to reply. Respondent did not refer to ITC-04 returns. Petitioner could have provided comprehensive explanation. Order set aside on condition of remitting Rs. 3,50,00,000/- towards disputed tax demand within six weeks and permitted to submit reply with relevant documents. Petition disposed of.
Demand regarding disparity between e-way bills and GSTR 3B returns for 2018-19 to 2020-21 assessment periods. Petitioner stated disparity due to non-taxable supplies in e-way bills portal. Supporting documents not annexed to reply. Respondent did not refer to ITC-04 returns. Petitioner could have provided comprehensive explanation. Order set aside on condition of remitting Rs. 3,50,00,000/- towards disputed tax demand within six weeks and permitted to submit reply with relevant documents. Petition disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.