Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed despite the assessee withdrawing the exemption claim u/s 10(38) for Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) on sale of penny stocks and offering the corresponding amount as income from "Other sources" in the return filed in response to notice u/s 148. The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer failed to dislodge the bona fide explanation of the assessee for withdrawing the LTCG exemption claim and offering the amount as income from "Other sources". Explanation 3 to Section 271(1)(c) deems income disclosed in the return filed u/s 148 as concealed income only in specific circumstances, which were not applicable in the assessee's case. No inaccurate particulars or concealment of income were found, and the assessee withdrew the exemption claim and offered the amount as income to avoid litigation. Since penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) are quasi-criminal, the assessee cannot be penalized in the absence of conclusive evidence of furnishing false particulars.
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed despite the assessee withdrawing the exemption claim u/s 10(38) for Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) on sale of penny stocks and offering the corresponding amount as income from "Other sources" in the return filed in response to notice u/s 148. The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer failed to dislodge the bona fide explanation of the assessee for withdrawing the LTCG exemption claim and offering the amount as income from "Other sources". Explanation 3 to Section 271(1)(c) deems income disclosed in the return filed u/s 148 as concealed income only in specific circumstances, which were not applicable in the assessee's case. No inaccurate particulars or concealment of income were found, and the assessee withdrew the exemption claim and offered the amount as income to avoid litigation. Since penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) are quasi-criminal, the assessee cannot be penalized in the absence of conclusive evidence of furnishing false particulars.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.