Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
501 to 520 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Respondent resorted to profiteering by not passing on benefit of GST rate reduction from 28% to 18% on cinema ticket prices above Rs. 100 during 01.01.2019 to 30.04.2019, profiteering Rs. 54,44,642 including GST. Directed to reduce prices commensurately, deposit profiteered amount of Rs. 54,44,642 with 18% interest equally in Central and State Consumer Welfare Funds as recipients unidentifiable. Violated Section 171(1) but penalty under 171(3A) not applicable retrospectively as provision inserted from 01.01.2020.
Respondent resorted to profiteering by not passing on benefit of GST rate reduction from 28% to 18% on cinema ticket prices above Rs. 100 during 01.01.2019 to 30.04.2019, profiteering Rs. 54,44,642 including GST. Directed to reduce prices commensurately, deposit profiteered amount of Rs. 54,44,642 with 18% interest equally in Central and State Consumer Welfare Funds as recipients unidentifiable. Violated Section 171(1) but penalty under 171(3A) not applicable retrospectively as provision inserted from 01.01.2020.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.