Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Respondent resorted to profiteering by not passing on benefit of GST rate reduction from 28% to 18% on cinema ticket prices above Rs. 100 during 01.01.2019 to 30.04.2019, profiteering Rs. 54,44,642 including GST. Directed to reduce prices commensurately, deposit profiteered amount of Rs. 54,44,642 with 18% interest equally in Central and State Consumer Welfare Funds as recipients unidentifiable. Violated Section 171(1) but penalty under 171(3A) not applicable retrospectively as provision inserted from 01.01.2020.
Respondent resorted to profiteering by not passing on benefit of GST rate reduction from 28% to 18% on cinema ticket prices above Rs. 100 during 01.01.2019 to 30.04.2019, profiteering Rs. 54,44,642 including GST. Directed to reduce prices commensurately, deposit profiteered amount of Rs. 54,44,642 with 18% interest equally in Central and State Consumer Welfare Funds as recipients unidentifiable. Violated Section 171(1) but penalty under 171(3A) not applicable retrospectively as provision inserted from 01.01.2020.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
