Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3041 to 3060 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Respondent resorted to profiteering by not passing on benefit of GST rate reduction from 28% to 18% on cinema ticket prices above Rs. 100 during 01.01.2019 to 30.04.2019, profiteering Rs. 54,44,642 including GST. Directed to reduce prices commensurately, deposit profiteered amount of Rs. 54,44,642 with 18% interest equally in Central and State Consumer Welfare Funds as recipients unidentifiable. Violated Section 171(1) but penalty under 171(3A) not applicable retrospectively as provision inserted from 01.01.2020.
Respondent resorted to profiteering by not passing on benefit of GST rate reduction from 28% to 18% on cinema ticket prices above Rs. 100 during 01.01.2019 to 30.04.2019, profiteering Rs. 54,44,642 including GST. Directed to reduce prices commensurately, deposit profiteered amount of Rs. 54,44,642 with 18% interest equally in Central and State Consumer Welfare Funds as recipients unidentifiable. Violated Section 171(1) but penalty under 171(3A) not applicable retrospectively as provision inserted from 01.01.2020.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
