Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Respondent resorted to profiteering by not reducing selling price commensurately despite GST rate reduction from 28% to 18% on cinema tickets above Rs. 100, from 01.01.2019 to 05.02.2019, profiteering Rs. 13,99,061 including GST. Respondent directed to reduce prices keeping rate reduction in view, having revised ticket price from Rs. 150 to Rs. 138 from 06.02.2019 depicting commensurate benefit passing. Respondent denied rate reduction benefit to customers violating Section 171(1) of CGST Act, 2017, committing offence u/s 171(3A) inserted from 01.01.2020, hence penalty u/s 171(3A) cannot be imposed retrospectively for said period.
Respondent resorted to profiteering by not reducing selling price commensurately despite GST rate reduction from 28% to 18% on cinema tickets above Rs. 100, from 01.01.2019 to 05.02.2019, profiteering Rs. 13,99,061 including GST. Respondent directed to reduce prices keeping rate reduction in view, having revised ticket price from Rs. 150 to Rs. 138 from 06.02.2019 depicting commensurate benefit passing. Respondent denied rate reduction benefit to customers violating Section 171(1) of CGST Act, 2017, committing offence u/s 171(3A) inserted from 01.01.2020, hence penalty u/s 171(3A) cannot be imposed retrospectively for said period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
