Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
Tribunal and CIT(A) concurred that Assessing Officer (AO) did not record any finding of undisclosed investment discovered during Excise Department's search, merely assumed undisclosed investment as source for recorded purchases and subsequent sales. Tribunal's view upheld that in absence of specific findings of embedded investment, only profit margin on undisclosed sales should be taxed. High Court found no substantial question of law arising from Tribunal's impugned order.
Tribunal and CIT(A) concurred that Assessing Officer (AO) did not record any finding of undisclosed investment discovered during Excise Department's search, merely assumed undisclosed investment as source for recorded purchases and subsequent sales. Tribunal's view upheld that in absence of specific findings of embedded investment, only profit margin on undisclosed sales should be taxed. High Court found no substantial question of law arising from Tribunal's impugned order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
