TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Functional comparability governs software-service benchmarking: dissimilar companies are excluded, while related-party filters, margins and working-ca...
The Court held that the amount paid by parents for admission of students to the educational institution run by the trust should be treated as corpus donation and not capitation fee. The Assessing Officer erred in treating the donation as capitation fee without proper inquiry from parents regarding the nature of payment. In absence of any contrary evidence, the amount cannot be characterized as capitation fee and the trust is entitled to exemption u/s 11(1)(d). The Tribunal's decision treating admission fee as non-corpus was incorrect. The appeal was decided in favor of the assessee against the revenue.
The Court held that the amount paid by parents for admission of students to the educational institution run by the trust should be treated as corpus donation and not capitation fee. The Assessing Officer erred in treating the donation as capitation fee without proper inquiry from parents regarding the nature of payment. In absence of any contrary evidence, the amount cannot be characterized as capitation fee and the trust is entitled to exemption u/s 11(1)(d). The Tribunal's decision treating admission fee as non-corpus was incorrect. The appeal was decided in favor of the assessee against the revenue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.