Functional comparability governs selection of support-service and IT-enabled service comparables, with verification required for unresolved data and m...
Bank account freezing requires statutory authority; anti-money-laundering compliance and KYC monitoring do not permit unilateral indefinite restrictio...
The assessee claimed excess deduction u/s 36(1)(viia) for provision for bad and doubtful debts, leading to escapement of income. The Assessing Officer rightly formed the belief of income escapement based on assessment records obtained from the Income Tax Officer, revealing the excess deduction claim. It was not a case of change of opinion, as the statutory provisions u/s 36(1)(viia) limit the deduction to 7.5% of total income, leaving no room for differing opinions. The tangible material justified reopening the assessment, and the assessee's reliance on the Delta Airlines case was misplaced. The appeal was dismissed, as it was a clear case of income escapement due to excess deduction claimed, contrary to statutory provisions.
The assessee claimed excess deduction u/s 36(1)(viia) for provision for bad and doubtful debts, leading to escapement of income. The Assessing Officer rightly formed the belief of income escapement based on assessment records obtained from the Income Tax Officer, revealing the excess deduction claim. It was not a case of change of opinion, as the statutory provisions u/s 36(1)(viia) limit the deduction to 7.5% of total income, leaving no room for differing opinions. The tangible material justified reopening the assessment, and the assessee's reliance on the Delta Airlines case was misplaced. The appeal was dismissed, as it was a clear case of income escapement due to excess deduction claimed, contrary to statutory provisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.