Handicraft job work receives concessional GST only for registered principals and predominantly handmade goods; commercial resin articles remain taxabl...
Reassessment disclosure requirements permit stated reasons without revealing information sources, but prior-taxation claims require full examination b...
Independent assessment discretion and corroborated electronic evidence determine validity of on-money additions and undisclosed-consideration assessme...
The NCLAT held that the Supreme Court's clarification in M/S. TULIP STAR HOTELS LIMITED & ANR. VERSUS MR. ANISH NIRANJAN NANAVATY & ANR. stated that reworking/verification of claims would not impact the Resolution Plan or its implementation. The re-verification of Pegasus's claim by the Resolution Professional (RP) at 14.85%, upon Pegasus's request, was valid, and the Adjudicating Authority correctly approved it. The Appellant, a shareholder and promoter, was not proposed any amount in the Resolution Plan. The NCLAT found no error in the Adjudicating Authority's approval of the Resolution Plan in accordance with the statutory scheme and dismissed the appeal.
The NCLAT held that the Supreme Court's clarification in M/S. TULIP STAR HOTELS LIMITED & ANR. VERSUS MR. ANISH NIRANJAN NANAVATY & ANR. stated that reworking/verification of claims would not impact the Resolution Plan or its implementation. The re-verification of Pegasus's claim by the Resolution Professional (RP) at 14.85%, upon Pegasus's request, was valid, and the Adjudicating Authority correctly approved it. The Appellant, a shareholder and promoter, was not proposed any amount in the Resolution Plan. The NCLAT found no error in the Adjudicating Authority's approval of the Resolution Plan in accordance with the statutory scheme and dismissed the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
