Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The definition of residential complex excludes from service tax levy, a complex constructed by directly engaging a person for design and planning, where the construction is intended for personal use as residence. Relying on Khurana Engineering, where services provided to the Government for residential complex were treated as for 'personal use', the Tribunal held that the construction services provided by the respondents to GSPHCL, SMC, and SUDA, being Government bodies, were for non-commercial purpose and outside service tax purview. The services were treated as provided to the Government, and the end-use of the residential complex by the Government was covered under the definition of 'personal use' in the residential complex service, hence not leviable to service tax. The department's appeals were dismissed as lacking merit.
The definition of residential complex excludes from service tax levy, a complex constructed by directly engaging a person for design and planning, where the construction is intended for personal use as residence. Relying on Khurana Engineering, where services provided to the Government for residential complex were treated as for 'personal use', the Tribunal held that the construction services provided by the respondents to GSPHCL, SMC, and SUDA, being Government bodies, were for non-commercial purpose and outside service tax purview. The services were treated as provided to the Government, and the end-use of the residential complex by the Government was covered under the definition of 'personal use' in the residential complex service, hence not leviable to service tax. The department's appeals were dismissed as lacking merit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.