Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ruled that non-deduction of...
Non-deduction of TDS on directors' fees & transaction charges not liable for penalty. Payments to directors allowed. Bona fide belief on transaction charges.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ruled that non-deduction of TDS on directors' fees and transaction charges u/s 194J was not liable for penalty u/s 271C. It accepted the assessee's contention that payments to directors on account of sitting fees were allowable. Regarding transaction charges, the assessee had a bona fide belief that they were not covered u/s 194J(1)(ba), as there is no such head. Consequently, non-deduction of TDS was not justified for imposing penalty. The assessee's appeal was allowed.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ruled that non-deduction of TDS on directors' fees and transaction charges u/s 194J was not liable for penalty u/s 271C. It accepted the assessee's contention that payments to directors on account of sitting fees were allowable. Regarding transaction charges, the assessee had a bona fide belief that they were not covered u/s 194J(1)(ba), as there is no such head. Consequently, non-deduction of TDS was not justified for imposing penalty. The assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.