Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
There is inconsistency in adjudicating the assessee's functional profile. The Tribunal treated the assessee as TPO/KPO for certain years but as a non-KPO/ITeS for another year. The TPO must examine the assessee's work profile, agreements with AEs, functions performed, qualifications and experience of employees, and remuneration paid to determine whether the assessee is an ITeS/KPO/high-end BPO or a low-end BPO. The TPO shall decide the ALP afresh after providing an opportunity of hearing to the assessee as per due process. The assessee must produce relevant documents to substantiate its non-KPO/ITeS status. The appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.
There is inconsistency in adjudicating the assessee's functional profile. The Tribunal treated the assessee as TPO/KPO for certain years but as a non-KPO/ITeS for another year. The TPO must examine the assessee's work profile, agreements with AEs, functions performed, qualifications and experience of employees, and remuneration paid to determine whether the assessee is an ITeS/KPO/high-end BPO or a low-end BPO. The TPO shall decide the ALP afresh after providing an opportunity of hearing to the assessee as per due process. The assessee must produce relevant documents to substantiate its non-KPO/ITeS status. The appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.