Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
There is inconsistency in adjudicating the assessee's functional profile. The Tribunal treated the assessee as TPO/KPO for certain years but as a non-KPO/ITeS for another year. The TPO must examine the assessee's work profile, agreements with AEs, functions performed, qualifications and experience of employees, and remuneration paid to determine whether the assessee is an ITeS/KPO/high-end BPO or a low-end BPO. The TPO shall decide the ALP afresh after providing an opportunity of hearing to the assessee as per due process. The assessee must produce relevant documents to substantiate its non-KPO/ITeS status. The appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.
There is inconsistency in adjudicating the assessee's functional profile. The Tribunal treated the assessee as TPO/KPO for certain years but as a non-KPO/ITeS for another year. The TPO must examine the assessee's work profile, agreements with AEs, functions performed, qualifications and experience of employees, and remuneration paid to determine whether the assessee is an ITeS/KPO/high-end BPO or a low-end BPO. The TPO shall decide the ALP afresh after providing an opportunity of hearing to the assessee as per due process. The assessee must produce relevant documents to substantiate its non-KPO/ITeS status. The appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.