Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The assessee, a septuagenarian gynecologist with no business income during the year, made cash deposits totaling Rs. 10 lakh in her bank account during demonetization. The explanation provided was that the deposits were sourced from past accumulated cash savings kept in her bank locker, corroborated by her operating the locker on the deposit date, and cash withdrawals from her accounts during the year. The Tribunal found substance in her claim, considering her past income, regular tax filings, age, and lack of evidence suggesting unexplained money. The cash withdrawals were not conclusively proved to have been utilized, lending credibility to her claim of depositing part of the withdrawn cash. Consequently, no adverse inference could be drawn regarding the cash deposits made during demonetization.
The assessee, a septuagenarian gynecologist with no business income during the year, made cash deposits totaling Rs. 10 lakh in her bank account during demonetization. The explanation provided was that the deposits were sourced from past accumulated cash savings kept in her bank locker, corroborated by her operating the locker on the deposit date, and cash withdrawals from her accounts during the year. The Tribunal found substance in her claim, considering her past income, regular tax filings, age, and lack of evidence suggesting unexplained money. The cash withdrawals were not conclusively proved to have been utilized, lending credibility to her claim of depositing part of the withdrawn cash. Consequently, no adverse inference could be drawn regarding the cash deposits made during demonetization.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.