Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The assessee, a septuagenarian gynecologist with no business income during the year, made cash deposits totaling Rs. 10 lakh in her bank account during demonetization. The explanation provided was that the deposits were sourced from past accumulated cash savings kept in her bank locker, corroborated by her operating the locker on the deposit date, and cash withdrawals from her accounts during the year. The Tribunal found substance in her claim, considering her past income, regular tax filings, age, and lack of evidence suggesting unexplained money. The cash withdrawals were not conclusively proved to have been utilized, lending credibility to her claim of depositing part of the withdrawn cash. Consequently, no adverse inference could be drawn regarding the cash deposits made during demonetization.
The assessee, a septuagenarian gynecologist with no business income during the year, made cash deposits totaling Rs. 10 lakh in her bank account during demonetization. The explanation provided was that the deposits were sourced from past accumulated cash savings kept in her bank locker, corroborated by her operating the locker on the deposit date, and cash withdrawals from her accounts during the year. The Tribunal found substance in her claim, considering her past income, regular tax filings, age, and lack of evidence suggesting unexplained money. The cash withdrawals were not conclusively proved to have been utilized, lending credibility to her claim of depositing part of the withdrawn cash. Consequently, no adverse inference could be drawn regarding the cash deposits made during demonetization.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
