Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Transfer pricing adjustment - Determination of arm's length price for power transferred by assessee's captive power plant to non-eligible manufacturing units, reducing deduction claimed u/s 80IA. Market value of power supplied by captive power plants to industrial units should be computed based on rate charged by State Electricity Board for supplying electricity to industrial consumers, as per Supreme Court decision in Rungta Mines Ltd. The rate at which generating units sell power to distribution companies cannot be considered market value, as it does not represent uncontrolled market conditions. The Tribunal correctly computed market value by comparing with rate charged by State Electricity Board to industrial consumers. Appeal of revenue dismissed in favor of assessee.
Transfer pricing adjustment - Determination of arm's length price for power transferred by assessee's captive power plant to non-eligible manufacturing units, reducing deduction claimed u/s 80IA. Market value of power supplied by captive power plants to industrial units should be computed based on rate charged by State Electricity Board for supplying electricity to industrial consumers, as per Supreme Court decision in Rungta Mines Ltd. The rate at which generating units sell power to distribution companies cannot be considered market value, as it does not represent uncontrolled market conditions. The Tribunal correctly computed market value by comparing with rate charged by State Electricity Board to industrial consumers. Appeal of revenue dismissed in favor of assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
