Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Transfer pricing adjustment - Determination of arm's length price for power transferred by assessee's captive power plant to non-eligible manufacturing units, reducing deduction claimed u/s 80IA. Market value of power supplied by captive power plants to industrial units should be computed based on rate charged by State Electricity Board for supplying electricity to industrial consumers, as per Supreme Court decision in Rungta Mines Ltd. The rate at which generating units sell power to distribution companies cannot be considered market value, as it does not represent uncontrolled market conditions. The Tribunal correctly computed market value by comparing with rate charged by State Electricity Board to industrial consumers. Appeal of revenue dismissed in favor of assessee.
Transfer pricing adjustment - Determination of arm's length price for power transferred by assessee's captive power plant to non-eligible manufacturing units, reducing deduction claimed u/s 80IA. Market value of power supplied by captive power plants to industrial units should be computed based on rate charged by State Electricity Board for supplying electricity to industrial consumers, as per Supreme Court decision in Rungta Mines Ltd. The rate at which generating units sell power to distribution companies cannot be considered market value, as it does not represent uncontrolled market conditions. The Tribunal correctly computed market value by comparing with rate charged by State Electricity Board to industrial consumers. Appeal of revenue dismissed in favor of assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.