Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited financials. Disallowance falls under Explanation 1 r.w. Explanation 4 of Section 271(1)(c). Assessee cannot correct claim through letter, must file revised return as per Goetze (India) Ltd. Mere disclosure in forms/reports doesn't preclude penalty for wrongful claim. Penalty rightly imposed for inflated expenses in revised return. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) not attracted for delayed deposit of employees' contribution, allowable based on prevailing judgments favoring assessee. Penalty u/s 270A - Misreporting not established for delayed contribution, assessee's claim supported by Alom Extrusions. Penalty u/s 270A vacated. No penalty for increase in book profit disclosed in revised return and determined by AO u/s 144.
Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited financials. Disallowance falls under Explanation 1 r.w. Explanation 4 of Section 271(1)(c). Assessee cannot correct claim through letter, must file revised return as per Goetze (India) Ltd. Mere disclosure in forms/reports doesn't preclude penalty for wrongful claim. Penalty rightly imposed for inflated expenses in revised return. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) not attracted for delayed deposit of employees' contribution, allowable based on prevailing judgments favoring assessee. Penalty u/s 270A - Misreporting not established for delayed contribution, assessee's claim supported by Alom Extrusions. Penalty u/s 270A vacated. No penalty for increase in book profit disclosed in revised return and determined by AO u/s 144.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.