Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Appellant (SIDBI) had established a clear case of continuous defaults by the Respondent (Sambandh Finserve Private Limited) in loan repayment post the suspension period u/s 10A of the IBC. The Respondent admitted the debt and default, and the consistent default date of 10.07.2021 in the fresh application substantiated the Appellant's claim. Each failure to pay an installment constituted a fresh default, justifying initiation of insolvency proceedings u/s 7 of the IBC. The Appeal was allowed, admitting the application for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against the Respondent.
The Appellant (SIDBI) had established a clear case of continuous defaults by the Respondent (Sambandh Finserve Private Limited) in loan repayment post the suspension period u/s 10A of the IBC. The Respondent admitted the debt and default, and the consistent default date of 10.07.2021 in the fresh application substantiated the Appellant's claim. Each failure to pay an installment constituted a fresh default, justifying initiation of insolvency proceedings u/s 7 of the IBC. The Appeal was allowed, admitting the application for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against the Respondent.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.