Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The appellants' contention that pool lifting charges do not add value to the marketability of vehicles is unacceptable. The Tribunal's decision in Victory Electricals Ltd. case established that the resultant price after deducting liquidated damages or penalties from the agreed price constitutes the "transaction value" liable for excise duty. Regarding the extended period of limitation and penalty, various show cause notices were issued based on the same financial records. If the department overlooked certain issues earlier, the appellants cannot be blamed, and the extended period cannot be invoked. Imposing penalty without "mens rea" in transaction matters is against settled legal principles. Therefore, the demand is restricted to the normal period, penalty set aside, but interest on confirmed duty for the normal period is payable. The appeals are partly allowed.
The appellants' contention that pool lifting charges do not add value to the marketability of vehicles is unacceptable. The Tribunal's decision in Victory Electricals Ltd. case established that the resultant price after deducting liquidated damages or penalties from the agreed price constitutes the "transaction value" liable for excise duty. Regarding the extended period of limitation and penalty, various show cause notices were issued based on the same financial records. If the department overlooked certain issues earlier, the appellants cannot be blamed, and the extended period cannot be invoked. Imposing penalty without "mens rea" in transaction matters is against settled legal principles. Therefore, the demand is restricted to the normal period, penalty set aside, but interest on confirmed duty for the normal period is payable. The appeals are partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
