Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Profiteering established by increasing base prices of movie tickets despite GST rate reduction from 28% to 18% for admission tickets above Rs. 100, contravening Section 171 of CGST Act. Respondent failed to pass on benefit of Rs. 88,67,790/- to customers from 01.01.2019 to 30.04.2020. Directed to reduce ticket prices commensurately and deposit profiteered amount with interest at 18% in equal parts in Central and State Consumer Welfare Funds within 3 months, failing which to be recovered as per GST Act. Penalty imposed for denying rate reduction benefit from 01.01.2020 onwards, constituting offence u/s 171(3A) of CGST Act.
Profiteering established by increasing base prices of movie tickets despite GST rate reduction from 28% to 18% for admission tickets above Rs. 100, contravening Section 171 of CGST Act. Respondent failed to pass on benefit of Rs. 88,67,790/- to customers from 01.01.2019 to 30.04.2020. Directed to reduce ticket prices commensurately and deposit profiteered amount with interest at 18% in equal parts in Central and State Consumer Welfare Funds within 3 months, failing which to be recovered as per GST Act. Penalty imposed for denying rate reduction benefit from 01.01.2020 onwards, constituting offence u/s 171(3A) of CGST Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
