Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 for "non-genuine loss" on account of assessee's transactions in futures and options (F&O) was unjustified. The reasons recorded did not disclose any income escaping assessment as the effect of loss and profit was nil. No information showed assessee earned any income not offered to tax. No correlation was established between assessee's transactions resulting in equal loss and profit and observations of Apex Court or SEBI order on manipulative reversal trades. Merely referring to Apex Court order and SEBI observations without co-relating assessee's identical loss and profit contracts was insufficient to conclude income escaped assessment. No effect on assessee's income due to F&O loss and profit. Reasons recorded cannot be said to form reason to believe income escaped assessment for assuming jurisdiction u/s 148 to reopen assessment for the year. Decided in favor of assessee.
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 for "non-genuine loss" on account of assessee's transactions in futures and options (F&O) was unjustified. The reasons recorded did not disclose any income escaping assessment as the effect of loss and profit was nil. No information showed assessee earned any income not offered to tax. No correlation was established between assessee's transactions resulting in equal loss and profit and observations of Apex Court or SEBI order on manipulative reversal trades. Merely referring to Apex Court order and SEBI observations without co-relating assessee's identical loss and profit contracts was insufficient to conclude income escaped assessment. No effect on assessee's income due to F&O loss and profit. Reasons recorded cannot be said to form reason to believe income escaped assessment for assuming jurisdiction u/s 148 to reopen assessment for the year. Decided in favor of assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.