Reassessment disclosure requirements permit stated reasons without revealing information sources, but prior-taxation claims require full examination b...
Independent assessment discretion and corroborated electronic evidence determine validity of on-money additions and undisclosed-consideration assessme...
Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
In accordance with CBDT Instruction No. 3 of 2017, the AO exceeded jurisdiction by conducting inquiry into cash deposits up to Rs. 2.5 lakhs by an individual without business income. As per Source Specific General Verification Guidelines, no further verification is required for such cash deposits. The ITAT held that the AO erred by disregarding CBDT guidelines, which are binding, and relied on coordinate bench rulings granting exemption up to Rs. 2,50,000. Consequently, the assessee's appeal was allowed.
In accordance with CBDT Instruction No. 3 of 2017, the AO exceeded jurisdiction by conducting inquiry into cash deposits up to Rs. 2.5 lakhs by an individual without business income. As per Source Specific General Verification Guidelines, no further verification is required for such cash deposits. The ITAT held that the AO erred by disregarding CBDT guidelines, which are binding, and relied on coordinate bench rulings granting exemption up to Rs. 2,50,000. Consequently, the assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
