Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Court held that the Commissioner (Appeals) could not have passed the impugned order as it relied upon an order which was quashed and set aside by the High Court. The High Court had previously held that if the Commissioner (Appeals) was satisfied that new facts emerged, he could not decide the matter himself and should have remanded it for fresh consideration. Consequently, the impugned order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) was quashed, and it was held that the petitioners were entitled to exemption for additional customs duty for aluminum waste and scrap under the relevant notification.
The Court held that the Commissioner (Appeals) could not have passed the impugned order as it relied upon an order which was quashed and set aside by the High Court. The High Court had previously held that if the Commissioner (Appeals) was satisfied that new facts emerged, he could not decide the matter himself and should have remanded it for fresh consideration. Consequently, the impugned order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) was quashed, and it was held that the petitioners were entitled to exemption for additional customs duty for aluminum waste and scrap under the relevant notification.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.