Toy balloon tariff classification: functional heading prevails over residual rubber and festive article headings, supporting penalties for deliberate ...
Customs valuation using comparable contemporaneous imports can displace declared value, while missing speaking orders require pursuit before competent...
Foreign customs declarations and importer admissions established undervaluation, supporting sequential value redetermination, differential duty, and m...
Customs seizure safeguards prevent detention-based limitation avoidance and invalidate provisional release conditions for imported vehicles under an i...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
361 to 380 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The period of limitation for filing a petition u/s 34 of the Arbitration Act commenced from 1st July 2022, excluding 30th June 2022 when the award was received. The three-month limitation period expired on 30th September 2022, a day before the pooja vacation commenced on 1st October 2022. The appellants were not entitled to the benefit of Section 4 of the Limitation Act as the prescribed period ended on 30th September 2022. The maximum 30-day extension u/s 34(3) expired on 30th October 2022, but the petition was filed on 31st October 2022. The High Court rightly held that the petition was not filed within the specified period u/s 34(3). The appeal was dismissed.
The period of limitation for filing a petition u/s 34 of the Arbitration Act commenced from 1st July 2022, excluding 30th June 2022 when the award was received. The three-month limitation period expired on 30th September 2022, a day before the pooja vacation commenced on 1st October 2022. The appellants were not entitled to the benefit of Section 4 of the Limitation Act as the prescribed period ended on 30th September 2022. The maximum 30-day extension u/s 34(3) expired on 30th October 2022, but the petition was filed on 31st October 2022. The High Court rightly held that the petition was not filed within the specified period u/s 34(3). The appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.