Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
FEMA offences - Liability of person-in-charge of company - Investment in forex trading bitcoins traded in USD - Indian currency seized worth Rs. 1,97,03,000/- confiscated to Central Government account u/s 13(2) of FEMA, 1999. Enforcement Directorate's (ED) contention for remanding case to initiate fresh proceedings against respondents along with M/s Ambidant Marketing Pvt. Ltd. rejected due to: (1) No notice issued to Ambidant, revision petition not maintainable; (2) Ambidant not impleaded as party; (3) Ambidant incorporated in Dubai, beyond territorial jurisdiction; (4) Seized currency already confiscated; (5) Penalty not recovered, respondents untraceable; (6) Ambidant's operational status unknown; (7) Revisions without penalty realization attempt to favor noticees; (8) Revision filed after 10 months, time-barred. Appellate Tribunal's decision upheld.
FEMA offences - Liability of person-in-charge of company - Investment in forex trading bitcoins traded in USD - Indian currency seized worth Rs. 1,97,03,000/- confiscated to Central Government account u/s 13(2) of FEMA, 1999. Enforcement Directorate's (ED) contention for remanding case to initiate fresh proceedings against respondents along with M/s Ambidant Marketing Pvt. Ltd. rejected due to: (1) No notice issued to Ambidant, revision petition not maintainable; (2) Ambidant not impleaded as party; (3) Ambidant incorporated in Dubai, beyond territorial jurisdiction; (4) Seized currency already confiscated; (5) Penalty not recovered, respondents untraceable; (6) Ambidant's operational status unknown; (7) Revisions without penalty realization attempt to favor noticees; (8) Revision filed after 10 months, time-barred. Appellate Tribunal's decision upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.