Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
Impugned show cause notice for shortfall in service tax payment based on Rule 5(1) of Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006 quashed as ultra vires Section 67 of Finance Act, 1994. Supreme Court held Rule 5 and Rule 2(c) of Rules, 2006 cannot include reimbursable expenses in taxable value prior to amendment of Section 67 by Finance Act, 2015 with effect from May 14, 2015. Show cause notice pertaining to period before May 13, 2015 contrary to Supreme Court decision, hence quashed being without jurisdiction.
Impugned show cause notice for shortfall in service tax payment based on Rule 5(1) of Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006 quashed as ultra vires Section 67 of Finance Act, 1994. Supreme Court held Rule 5 and Rule 2(c) of Rules, 2006 cannot include reimbursable expenses in taxable value prior to amendment of Section 67 by Finance Act, 2015 with effect from May 14, 2015. Show cause notice pertaining to period before May 13, 2015 contrary to Supreme Court decision, hence quashed being without jurisdiction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.