Opportunity to furnish unsecured-loan confirmations is required before reassessment initiation; proceedings require fresh consideration after taxpayer...
Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
Impugned show cause notice for shortfall in service tax payment based on Rule 5(1) of Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006 quashed as ultra vires Section 67 of Finance Act, 1994. Supreme Court held Rule 5 and Rule 2(c) of Rules, 2006 cannot include reimbursable expenses in taxable value prior to amendment of Section 67 by Finance Act, 2015 with effect from May 14, 2015. Show cause notice pertaining to period before May 13, 2015 contrary to Supreme Court decision, hence quashed being without jurisdiction.
Impugned show cause notice for shortfall in service tax payment based on Rule 5(1) of Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006 quashed as ultra vires Section 67 of Finance Act, 1994. Supreme Court held Rule 5 and Rule 2(c) of Rules, 2006 cannot include reimbursable expenses in taxable value prior to amendment of Section 67 by Finance Act, 2015 with effect from May 14, 2015. Show cause notice pertaining to period before May 13, 2015 contrary to Supreme Court decision, hence quashed being without jurisdiction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
