Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Cenvat credit claims on spare parts considered as capital goods were rejected u/ss 11B and 12B of the Cenvat Excise Act. As per the definition of "Inputs" in Rule 2(k) of Cenvat Credit Rules, capital goods up to Rs.10,000/- are included, but not excluded from the definition of "Capital Goods". Spare parts of capital goods are covered under capital goods. The assessee has the option to claim Cenvat credit on such spare parts as capital goods or inputs. When two benefits are available, the more beneficial provision should be extended, as per the Supreme Court's judgment in SHARE MEDICAL CARE VS UNION OF INDIA. In the present case, the appellant claimed Cenvat credit on spare parts under capital goods, which is valid. The appellant is entitled to Notification No. 30/2004-CE and Cenvat credit on spare parts as capital goods. The appellant is also entitled to cash refund u/s 142(3) of CGST Act read with Section 11B. The impugned order is set aside, and the appeal is allowed.
Cenvat credit claims on spare parts considered as capital goods were rejected u/ss 11B and 12B of the Cenvat Excise Act. As per the definition of "Inputs" in Rule 2(k) of Cenvat Credit Rules, capital goods up to Rs.10,000/- are included, but not excluded from the definition of "Capital Goods". Spare parts of capital goods are covered under capital goods. The assessee has the option to claim Cenvat credit on such spare parts as capital goods or inputs. When two benefits are available, the more beneficial provision should be extended, as per the Supreme Court's judgment in SHARE MEDICAL CARE VS UNION OF INDIA. In the present case, the appellant claimed Cenvat credit on spare parts under capital goods, which is valid. The appellant is entitled to Notification No. 30/2004-CE and Cenvat credit on spare parts as capital goods. The appellant is also entitled to cash refund u/s 142(3) of CGST Act read with Section 11B. The impugned order is set aside, and the appeal is allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.