Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Cenvat credit claims on spare parts considered as capital goods were rejected u/ss 11B and 12B of the Cenvat Excise Act. As per the definition of "Inputs" in Rule 2(k) of Cenvat Credit Rules, capital goods up to Rs.10,000/- are included, but not excluded from the definition of "Capital Goods". Spare parts of capital goods are covered under capital goods. The assessee has the option to claim Cenvat credit on such spare parts as capital goods or inputs. When two benefits are available, the more beneficial provision should be extended, as per the Supreme Court's judgment in SHARE MEDICAL CARE VS UNION OF INDIA. In the present case, the appellant claimed Cenvat credit on spare parts under capital goods, which is valid. The appellant is entitled to Notification No. 30/2004-CE and Cenvat credit on spare parts as capital goods. The appellant is also entitled to cash refund u/s 142(3) of CGST Act read with Section 11B. The impugned order is set aside, and the appeal is allowed.
Cenvat credit claims on spare parts considered as capital goods were rejected u/ss 11B and 12B of the Cenvat Excise Act. As per the definition of "Inputs" in Rule 2(k) of Cenvat Credit Rules, capital goods up to Rs.10,000/- are included, but not excluded from the definition of "Capital Goods". Spare parts of capital goods are covered under capital goods. The assessee has the option to claim Cenvat credit on such spare parts as capital goods or inputs. When two benefits are available, the more beneficial provision should be extended, as per the Supreme Court's judgment in SHARE MEDICAL CARE VS UNION OF INDIA. In the present case, the appellant claimed Cenvat credit on spare parts under capital goods, which is valid. The appellant is entitled to Notification No. 30/2004-CE and Cenvat credit on spare parts as capital goods. The appellant is also entitled to cash refund u/s 142(3) of CGST Act read with Section 11B. The impugned order is set aside, and the appeal is allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.