Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Petitioner availed fake input tax credit through bogus billing, generating fake sale invoices. Provisional attachment of movable properties in addition to immovable properties already attached was ordered u/s 83 to protect government revenue interest. Authority formed opinion based on material that petitioner's immovable properties were insufficient to cover likely demand exceeding Rs. 76 crore arising from fraudulent invoices and input tax credit utilization. No harassment found in provisional attachment of movable properties during pendency of investigation to safeguard revenue interest. Petition dismissed by High Court.
Petitioner availed fake input tax credit through bogus billing, generating fake sale invoices. Provisional attachment of movable properties in addition to immovable properties already attached was ordered u/s 83 to protect government revenue interest. Authority formed opinion based on material that petitioner's immovable properties were insufficient to cover likely demand exceeding Rs. 76 crore arising from fraudulent invoices and input tax credit utilization. No harassment found in provisional attachment of movable properties during pendency of investigation to safeguard revenue interest. Petition dismissed by High Court.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
