Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Petitioner availed fake input tax credit through bogus billing, generating fake sale invoices. Provisional attachment of movable properties in addition to immovable properties already attached was ordered u/s 83 to protect government revenue interest. Authority formed opinion based on material that petitioner's immovable properties were insufficient to cover likely demand exceeding Rs. 76 crore arising from fraudulent invoices and input tax credit utilization. No harassment found in provisional attachment of movable properties during pendency of investigation to safeguard revenue interest. Petition dismissed by High Court.
Petitioner availed fake input tax credit through bogus billing, generating fake sale invoices. Provisional attachment of movable properties in addition to immovable properties already attached was ordered u/s 83 to protect government revenue interest. Authority formed opinion based on material that petitioner's immovable properties were insufficient to cover likely demand exceeding Rs. 76 crore arising from fraudulent invoices and input tax credit utilization. No harassment found in provisional attachment of movable properties during pendency of investigation to safeguard revenue interest. Petition dismissed by High Court.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
