Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Petitioner availed fake input tax credit through bogus billing, generating fake sale invoices. Provisional attachment of movable properties in addition to immovable properties already attached was ordered u/s 83 to protect government revenue interest. Authority formed opinion based on material that petitioner's immovable properties were insufficient to cover likely demand exceeding Rs. 76 crore arising from fraudulent invoices and input tax credit utilization. No harassment found in provisional attachment of movable properties during pendency of investigation to safeguard revenue interest. Petition dismissed by High Court.
Petitioner availed fake input tax credit through bogus billing, generating fake sale invoices. Provisional attachment of movable properties in addition to immovable properties already attached was ordered u/s 83 to protect government revenue interest. Authority formed opinion based on material that petitioner's immovable properties were insufficient to cover likely demand exceeding Rs. 76 crore arising from fraudulent invoices and input tax credit utilization. No harassment found in provisional attachment of movable properties during pendency of investigation to safeguard revenue interest. Petition dismissed by High Court.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
