Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
The Advance Ruling Authority held that the applicant, engaged in providing Information Technology (IT) and Information Technology Enabled Services (ITeS) for the healthcare sector, is eligible to avail input tax credit on contract staffing services received. The transaction does not fall under the categories barred by Section 17(5) of the CGST Act, 2017. The applicant can claim input tax credit on such services u/s 16(1) of the GST Act, 2017, subject to fulfilling the prescribed conditions for availing input tax credit.
The Advance Ruling Authority held that the applicant, engaged in providing Information Technology (IT) and Information Technology Enabled Services (ITeS) for the healthcare sector, is eligible to avail input tax credit on contract staffing services received. The transaction does not fall under the categories barred by Section 17(5) of the CGST Act, 2017. The applicant can claim input tax credit on such services u/s 16(1) of the GST Act, 2017, subject to fulfilling the prescribed conditions for availing input tax credit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.