Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reassessment proceedings initiated solely based on an audit...
Reassessment solely on audit objection sans new material is impermissible. Mere opinion change can't trigger reassessment, as it's a prohibited review.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Reassessment proceedings initiated solely based on an audit objection without fresh tangible material are impermissible. A mere change of opinion by the Assessing Officer on the same material cannot be a ground for reassessment, as it would amount to a review, which is not permissible. The corrigendum issued by the Revenue did not disclose any new material warranting reopening of the assessment. Consequently, the reassessment proceedings were quashed, being unsustainable in law.
Reassessment proceedings initiated solely based on an audit objection without fresh tangible material are impermissible. A mere change of opinion by the Assessing Officer on the same material cannot be a ground for reassessment, as it would amount to a review, which is not permissible. The corrigendum issued by the Revenue did not disclose any new material warranting reopening of the assessment. Consequently, the reassessment proceedings were quashed, being unsustainable in law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
