Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Reassessment proceedings initiated solely based on an audit...
Reassessment solely on audit objection sans new material is impermissible. Mere opinion change can't trigger reassessment, as it's a prohibited review.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Reassessment proceedings initiated solely based on an audit objection without fresh tangible material are impermissible. A mere change of opinion by the Assessing Officer on the same material cannot be a ground for reassessment, as it would amount to a review, which is not permissible. The corrigendum issued by the Revenue did not disclose any new material warranting reopening of the assessment. Consequently, the reassessment proceedings were quashed, being unsustainable in law.
Reassessment proceedings initiated solely based on an audit objection without fresh tangible material are impermissible. A mere change of opinion by the Assessing Officer on the same material cannot be a ground for reassessment, as it would amount to a review, which is not permissible. The corrigendum issued by the Revenue did not disclose any new material warranting reopening of the assessment. Consequently, the reassessment proceedings were quashed, being unsustainable in law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
