Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The assessee delayed filing an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (CIT(A)) by 1008 days, citing changes in administrative staff and management roles post-COVID as reasons. However, the COVID pandemic subsided in March 2022, yet the assessee filed the appeal in November 2022, a delay of eight months without valid justification. The assessee's representative merely stated illness of a partner and administrative problems, which were deemed insufficient reasons. According to Section 9 of the Limitation Act, once the limitation period commences, subsequent disabilities or inability do not stop it. The limitation period began on 02.09.2019, and the 1008-day delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) was not condoned due to lack of sufficient cause. Consequently, the assessee's appeal was dismissed.
The assessee delayed filing an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (CIT(A)) by 1008 days, citing changes in administrative staff and management roles post-COVID as reasons. However, the COVID pandemic subsided in March 2022, yet the assessee filed the appeal in November 2022, a delay of eight months without valid justification. The assessee's representative merely stated illness of a partner and administrative problems, which were deemed insufficient reasons. According to Section 9 of the Limitation Act, once the limitation period commences, subsequent disabilities or inability do not stop it. The limitation period began on 02.09.2019, and the 1008-day delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) was not condoned due to lack of sufficient cause. Consequently, the assessee's appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
