Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Duty paid twice, once at Mumbai where cargo cleared and erroneously at Calcutta airport where consignment never arrived. Department instead of verifying internally corresponded with importer seeking cancellation report from appraising group. EDI system auto-purges bills where no cargo arrived. Appellant provided bank certificate proving duty payment at Kolkata along with Mumbai clearance evidence. On next hearing, joint commissioner verified from Kolkata docks that no cargo arrived against that bill as no examination report or IGM number assigned. EDI printout confirmed no import against that bill and Rs.12,00,014.1/- paid wrongly. Lower authority order set aside, appellant's appeal allowed for refund of duty paid erroneously.
Duty paid twice, once at Mumbai where cargo cleared and erroneously at Calcutta airport where consignment never arrived. Department instead of verifying internally corresponded with importer seeking cancellation report from appraising group. EDI system auto-purges bills where no cargo arrived. Appellant provided bank certificate proving duty payment at Kolkata along with Mumbai clearance evidence. On next hearing, joint commissioner verified from Kolkata docks that no cargo arrived against that bill as no examination report or IGM number assigned. EDI printout confirmed no import against that bill and Rs.12,00,014.1/- paid wrongly. Lower authority order set aside, appellant's appeal allowed for refund of duty paid erroneously.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.