Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The appellants' services of promotion and marketing of films' music and song video rights acquired from Film Production Companies (FPCs) do not constitute 'Business Auxiliary Service' u/s 65(105)(zzb) of the Finance Act, 1994 for the period prior to 01.07.2012, or u/s 66B read with Section 65B(44) from 01.07.2012 onwards. The agreement between appellants and FPCs involved temporary transfer of specific rights related to songs and song videos, while FPCs retained other rights like merchandising, gaming, and IPR. The appellants' activities were limited to exploiting the assigned rights for consideration, not providing services to FPCs as clients. The adjudged demands and penalties imposed by the Commissioner of CGST, Mumbai West, are unsustainable as there was no suppression of information or evasion attempt by appellants. Invoking the extended period for demand is unjustified. The impugned order confirming the demands is set aside, and the appeal is allowed.
The appellants' services of promotion and marketing of films' music and song video rights acquired from Film Production Companies (FPCs) do not constitute 'Business Auxiliary Service' u/s 65(105)(zzb) of the Finance Act, 1994 for the period prior to 01.07.2012, or u/s 66B read with Section 65B(44) from 01.07.2012 onwards. The agreement between appellants and FPCs involved temporary transfer of specific rights related to songs and song videos, while FPCs retained other rights like merchandising, gaming, and IPR. The appellants' activities were limited to exploiting the assigned rights for consideration, not providing services to FPCs as clients. The adjudged demands and penalties imposed by the Commissioner of CGST, Mumbai West, are unsustainable as there was no suppression of information or evasion attempt by appellants. Invoking the extended period for demand is unjustified. The impugned order confirming the demands is set aside, and the appeal is allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.