Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
The appeal was dismissed as barred by limitation, and the doctrine of merger does not apply when an appeal is dismissed due to limitation. The merits were not examined by the Appellate Authority. The High Court retains jurisdiction under Article 226 to examine the legality and validity of the original authority's order. Considering the petitioner's assertion of bona fide reasons for the delay and willingness to pay outstanding dues with interest, subject to input tax credit, the matter is remitted back to the respondent for considering the petitioner's claim for revocation of GST cancellation after providing a reasonable opportunity.
The appeal was dismissed as barred by limitation, and the doctrine of merger does not apply when an appeal is dismissed due to limitation. The merits were not examined by the Appellate Authority. The High Court retains jurisdiction under Article 226 to examine the legality and validity of the original authority's order. Considering the petitioner's assertion of bona fide reasons for the delay and willingness to pay outstanding dues with interest, subject to input tax credit, the matter is remitted back to the respondent for considering the petitioner's claim for revocation of GST cancellation after providing a reasonable opportunity.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.